Busan → Rotterdam Shipping Route: Risk Profile

Why this lane scores Elevated — the 11 signals

ArcNautical's voyage engine composites eleven independent intelligence signals along the actual sea route, then weights each by how much it is driving risk on this corridor right now. Bar width = current severity of that signal; the percentage = its share of the composite score.

JWC Listed Areas 14% of score

Route transits 3 JWC listed area(s): Libya, Gulf of Aden and Indian Ocean (HRA), Red Sea and Bab el-Mandeb severity 70/100 · 3 signals

Piracy Incidents 14% of score

7 piracy incident(s) within 100nm of route severity 54/100 · 7 signals

Conflict Events 12% of score

8 conflict events within 200nm: 5 armed conflict(s), 3 military incident(s) severity 80/100 · 8 signals

Marine Weather 11% of score

Light to moderate seas: 0.0m waves, 29kt winds | Seasonal: Arabian Sea monsoon/cyclone season (1.6x baseline risk, June) severity 64/100 · 8 signals

Chokepoint Disruption 9% of score

Route transits 4 chokepoint(s): Suez Canal (elevated, 30), Malacca Strait (disrupted, 60), Bab el-Mandeb (disrupted, 40), Taiwan Strait (normal) severity 60/100 · 3 signals

Sanctions Exposure 8% of score

Transit through YE (OFAC, EU, UNSC); Transit through SO (OFAC, EU, UNSC); Transit through LY (EU, UNSC) severity 90/100 · 3 signals

Country Risk 8% of score

Route near 13 elevated-risk country/countries: ID, LK, YE, SO, SA, SD, EG, ES, GB, FR, CN, LY, IN severity 42/100 · 13 signals

Dark Activity 7% of score

151 dark activity event(s) within 80nm: 98 high, 49 medium severity 90/100 · 151 signals

Natural Disasters 7% of score

4 disaster event(s) within 200nm: 2 volcanic ash, 2 earthquake severity 7/100 · 4 signals

Navigational Warnings 6% of score

No active navigational warnings near route severity 0/100

AIS Disruptions 4% of score

No AIS disruptions near route severity 0/100

War-risk & piracy zones on this route

Listed-area intersections come from the Joint War Committee (JWC) hull-war zones, tested against the route geometry — not a country list. These are the areas underwriters load war-risk premium for.

WAR RISK Libya 6% of route inside the listed area
PIRACY (HRA) Gulf of Aden and Indian Ocean (HRA) 20% of route inside the listed area
WAR RISK Red Sea and Bab el-Mandeb 1% of route inside the listed area

7 recent piracy / armed-robbery incidents logged within 100 nm of the route (most recent: armed robbery near the Gulf of Aden).

Sanctions exposure on the corridor

This route runs 12% of its distance through sanctioned waters. A leg inside a sanctioned EEZ is where AIS-gap, dark-STS and shadow-fleet activity concentrate — the geography compliance teams have to be able to defend.

Route transits 3 sanctioned EEZ(s): Yemen [OFAC, UNSC] (5%), Libya [UNSC] (4%), Federal Republic of Somalia [OFAC, UNSC] (3%). 20 other EEZ(s): Indonesia (8%), China (6%), Taiwan (6%), Vietnam (5%), Sri Lanka (4%), Egypt (4%), Andaman and Nicobar (4%), Maldives (4%), Eritrea (4%), Halaib Triangle (3%), South Korea (3%), France (2%), Malaysia (1%), United Kingdom (1%), Netherlands (1%), Morocco (0%), Djibouti (0%), Algeria (0%), Singapore (0%), Belgium (0%)

Geography is only half the question. Before you fix the cargo, screen the specific vessel and its ownership chain against OFAC / EU / UN / UK lists:

Run a free vessel sanctions check →

FAQ

Is the Busan to Rotterdam shipping route high risk?

ArcNautical scores it 56/100 — Elevated risk. The largest drivers are JWC Listed Areas, Piracy Incidents, Conflict Events. The route crosses Libya and Gulf of Aden and Indian Ocean (HRA) and Red Sea and Bab el-Mandeb, and runs 12% of its distance through sanctioned waters.

Which chokepoints does the Busan–Rotterdam route cross?

Taiwan Strait, Singapore Strait, Malacca Strait, Bab el-Mandeb, Suez Canal, Strait of Gibraltar. Total distance 10,467 nautical miles, roughly 31 days at 14 knots.

Does the Busan to Rotterdam route pass through sanctioned waters?