Red Sea

Maritime Risk Briefing · 16 Commercial Ports

Regional Risk Context

The Red Sea corridor is among the highest-risk maritime regions in the world. Since late 2023, Houthi forces based in Yemen have conducted sustained attacks against commercial shipping transiting the Bab-el-Mandeb strait and the southern Red Sea, using a combination of anti-ship ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, naval mines, and unmanned surface and aerial vehicles. These attacks have fundamentally altered global shipping patterns, with major container lines diverting vessels around the Cape of Good Hope at significant cost and schedule disruption.

The Joint War Committee listed area covers the entire southern Red Sea, the Gulf of Aden, and the Bab-el-Mandeb strait. War risk premiums for vessels transiting this zone have surged, and some underwriters have imposed exclusion clauses for Houthi-related damage. Beyond the Houthi threat, the Red Sea corridor passes through waters adjacent to Eritrea, Sudan, and Somalia, each presenting distinct security concerns including piracy, port state instability, and sanctions exposure. The US-led Combined Maritime Forces (CMF) and EU Naval Force ATALANTA maintain naval presence in the region, but the threat density exceeds the capacity for comprehensive escort operations.

For maritime intelligence purposes, voyages in this corridor require monitoring of multiple threat layers simultaneously: Houthi attack patterns and declared military zones, navigational warnings from NGA and UKMTO, piracy activity reported by the IMB and ReCAAP, and real-time AIS data that may indicate vessels in distress or engaging in evasive maneuvering. ArcNautical integrates these signals into a single composite risk score computed along the planned route, providing a defensible basis for underwriting decisions, charter party negotiations, and operational planning.

Port State Control Context

Mediterranean MoU

The Mediterranean Memorandum of Understanding does not publish a public bulk detention feed. Member states (Algeria, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Tunisia) operate under harmonised PSC protocols. Vessel-level detention probability is computed by ArcNautical using flag-state performance and on-board condition signals.

Indian Ocean MoU

The Indian Ocean Memorandum of Understanding does not publish a public bulk detention feed. PSC inspection regimes across India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, the Maldives, Mauritius, Iran, and the African Indian Ocean states vary in rigour. ArcNautical evaluates vessel-level detention probability using flag performance, age, deficiency history, and ownership opacity signals.

Score a Voyage in the Red Sea

Plan and score a voyage using 10 intelligence signals โ€” composite risk, route-level threat exposure, sanctions screening, and fuel/CII estimates.

Open Voyage Scorer

Ports in the Red Sea

๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช Aden ๐ŸŸ  Sanctions program
Yemen · Multi-Purpose Port
๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฌ Ain Sokhna
Egypt · Container Terminal
๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ด Aqaba
Jordan · Multi-Purpose Port
๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ท Assab ๐ŸŸ  Sanctions program
Eritrea · General Cargo Port
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ด Berbera ๐ŸŸ  Sanctions program
Somalia (Somaliland) · Multi-Purpose Port
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฏ Djibouti
Djibouti · Multi-Purpose Port
๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฏ Doraleh
Djibouti · Container Terminal
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Eilat ๐ŸŸก Elevated instability
Israel · General Cargo Port
๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช Hodeidah ๐ŸŸ  Sanctions program
Yemen · Bulk Cargo Terminal
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Jeddah
Saudi Arabia · Container Terminal
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ King Abdullah
Saudi Arabia · Container Terminal
๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ท Massawa ๐ŸŸ  Sanctions program
Eritrea · General Cargo Port
๐Ÿ‡พ๐Ÿ‡ช Mokha ๐ŸŸ  Sanctions program
Yemen · General Cargo Port
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Port Sudan ๐ŸŸ  Sanctions program
Sudan · Multi-Purpose Port
๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฌ Suez
Egypt · Multi-Purpose Port
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Yanbu
Saudi Arabia · Tanker Terminal