Maritime Sanctions Data

Flag-of-convenience reliance by sanctions program

Data as of 2026-08-20 · source: U.S. Treasury OFAC Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) list
Flag-of-convenience reliance varies sharply by sanctions program: 63.5% of the Terror-finance / proliferation-program fleet flies a shell-jurisdiction flag versus 5.2% of the North Korea (DPRK)-program fleet — across 1,481 OFAC-designated vessels with a recorded flag (data as of 2026-08-20).
Sanctions regime (its flag-of-convenience rate)flag-of-convenience vessels% of total
Iran — 47.8% flag of convenience
300 60.9%
Russia — 26.4% flag of convenience
112 22.7%
Terror-finance / proliferation — 63.5% flag of convenience
61 12.4%
Venezuela — 21.7% flag of convenience
13 2.6%
North Korea (DPRK) — 5.2% flag of convenience
5 1%
Cuba — 33.3% flag of convenience
1 0.2%
Other regimes — 0.6% flag of convenience
1 0.2%
Total493100%
↓ CSV ↓ JSON (with provenance)

Methodology

Source: U.S. Treasury OFAC Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) list. Computed by the same ArcNautical engine behind arcnautical.com/check (commit e9f7afd7). Full scoring detail: methodology.

FAQ

Which sanctions program relies most on flags of convenience?
As of 2026-08-20, the Terror-finance / proliferation-program fleet has the highest flag-of-convenience rate (63.5% of its flagged vessels fly a shell-jurisdiction register), versus 5.2% for the North Korea (DPRK)-program fleet.
How is "flag of convenience" defined?
A registry classified Tier 3 by ArcNautical's jurisdiction-tier model — a flag-of-convenience / tax-haven register (e.g. Panama, Marshall Islands, Liberia) where beneficial-ownership disclosure is deliberately restricted. It is the same definition the ArcNautical vessel dossier and the by-flag dataset use.

Related