Maritime Sanctions Data

Flag-of-convenience reliance by sanctions program

Data as of 2026-06-23 · source: U.S. Treasury OFAC Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) list
Flag-of-convenience reliance varies sharply by sanctions program: 67.7% of the Terror-finance / proliferation-program fleet flies a shell-jurisdiction flag versus 5.2% of the North Korea (DPRK)-program fleet — across 1,464 OFAC-designated vessels with a recorded flag (data as of 2026-06-23).
Sanctions regime (its flag-of-convenience rate)flag-of-convenience vessels% of total
Iran — 49.3% flag of convenience
303 60.2%
Russia — 26.5% flag of convenience
113 22.5%
Terror-finance / proliferation — 67.7% flag of convenience
67 13.3%
Venezuela — 21.7% flag of convenience
13 2.6%
North Korea (DPRK) — 5.2% flag of convenience
5 1%
Cuba — 33.3% flag of convenience
1 0.2%
Other regimes — 0.6% flag of convenience
1 0.2%
Total503100%
↓ CSV ↓ JSON (with provenance)

Methodology

Source: U.S. Treasury OFAC Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) list. Computed by the same ArcNautical engine behind arcnautical.com/check (commit f36ce699). Full scoring detail: methodology.

FAQ

Which sanctions program relies most on flags of convenience?
As of 2026-06-23, the Terror-finance / proliferation-program fleet has the highest flag-of-convenience rate (67.7% of its flagged vessels fly a shell-jurisdiction register), versus 5.2% for the North Korea (DPRK)-program fleet.
How is "flag of convenience" defined?
A registry classified Tier 3 by ArcNautical's jurisdiction-tier model — a flag-of-convenience / tax-haven register (e.g. Panama, Marshall Islands, Liberia) where beneficial-ownership disclosure is deliberately restricted. It is the same definition the ArcNautical vessel dossier and the by-flag dataset use.

Related