ESPO-grade crude out of Russia’s Pacific coast into China’s Shandong refining cluster — the short sanctioned-origin Pacific haul.
Risk signals last computed live from ArcNautical's voyage engine · data confidence 100%. This score is not static — it moves with conditions on the lane.
ArcNautical's voyage engine composites eleven independent intelligence signals along the actual sea route, then weights each by how much it is driving risk on this corridor right now. Bar width = current severity of that signal; the percentage = its share of the composite score.
This route runs 24% of its distance through sanctioned waters. A leg inside a sanctioned EEZ is where AIS-gap, dark-STS and shadow-fleet activity concentrate — the geography compliance teams have to be able to defend.
Route transits 2 sanctioned EEZ(s): Russia [OFAC] (14%), North Korea [OFAC, UNSC] (11%). 2 other EEZ(s): China (16%), South Korea (3%)
Geography is only half the question. Before you fix the cargo, screen the specific vessel and its ownership chain against OFAC / EU / UN / UK lists:
Run a free vessel sanctions check →This profile is the corridor baseline. Run the live scorer with your vessel, load condition, speed and departure date for a voyage-specific risk read, a Monte-Carlo ETA distribution, and a downloadable report.
Open the live voyage scorer →Freight platforms price this lane. ArcNautical tells you what could go wrong on it.
ArcNautical scores it 23/100 — Low risk. The largest drivers are Sanctions Exposure, Marine Weather, Country Risk. The route crosses no listed war zones, and runs 24% of its distance through sanctioned waters.
. Total distance 708 nautical miles, roughly 2 days at 14 knots.
Route transits 2 sanctioned EEZ(s): Russia [OFAC] (14%), North Korea [OFAC, UNSC] (11%). 2 other EEZ(s): China (16%), South Korea (3%)